Comments on: An Undertaking of Biblical Proportions http://www.joelschou.com/journal/writings/2005/06/an-undertaking-of-biblical-proportions smarter blogging, finer art, both ears Fri, 21 Nov 2008 10:51:11 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.2 Comment on An Undertaking of Biblical Proportions by: John Pennypacker http://www.joelschou.com/journal/writings/2005/06/an-undertaking-of-biblical-proportions#comment-63 Mon, 20 Jun 2005 12:46:41 +0000 http://www.joelschou.com/journal/writings/2005/06/an-undertaking-of-biblical-proportions#comment-63 whoa. That is a big project! And you didn't the disclaimer for the pun. :p When do they expect to have it finished, I wonder? It would be something to see, for certain. whoa. That is a big project!

And you didn’t the disclaimer for the pun. :p

When do they expect to have it finished, I wonder? It would be something to see, for certain.

]]> Comment on An Undertaking of Biblical Proportions by: Halbie http://www.joelschou.com/journal/writings/2005/06/an-undertaking-of-biblical-proportions#comment-62 Sat, 18 Jun 2005 18:56:19 +0000 http://www.joelschou.com/journal/writings/2005/06/an-undertaking-of-biblical-proportions#comment-62 That's pretty cool looking. A very impressive feat to say the least. That’s pretty cool looking. A very impressive feat to say the least.

]]> Comment on An Undertaking of Biblical Proportions by: joel http://www.joelschou.com/journal/writings/2005/06/an-undertaking-of-biblical-proportions#comment-61 Sat, 18 Jun 2005 18:01:35 +0000 http://www.joelschou.com/journal/writings/2005/06/an-undertaking-of-biblical-proportions#comment-61 P.S. I didn't want to clutter the article with my shameful confession to the the horrible pun found both in the title and in the second to last paragraph. Yes, "Biblical Proportions" was intentional, but it is also too fitting a phrase not use it. Sorry. P.S. I didn’t want to clutter the article with my shameful confession to the the horrible pun found both in the title and in the second to last paragraph. Yes, “Biblical Proportions” was intentional, but it is also too fitting a phrase not use it. Sorry.

]]>